IUCN SSC Shark Specialist Group
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • Sponsors
    • Communication >
      • Visual Identity and Brand Guide
      • Communication Strategy
    • Documents
    • Membership | TOR
    • FAQ
  • Members
    • Who We Are >
      • Our Team
      • Our Members
      • Our History
    • Where We Work >
      • North America
      • Central America and the Caribbean
      • South America
      • Northern Europe
      • Mediterranean
      • Africa
      • Indian Ocean
      • ​Asia
      • Oceania
    • What We Do >
      • Aquarium Working Group
      • Assess Working Group
      • Bycatch Working Group
      • Communication Working Group
      • Deepwater Chondrichthyans Working Group
      • Future Leaders Working Group
      • Human Dimensions Working Group
      • Integrative Taxonomy Working Group
      • Marine Historical Ecology Working Group
  • Resources
    • Shark News >
      • Shark News | Submission Guidelines
    • Shark News Legacy
    • Publications >
      • Status Reports
      • Fisheries Management
      • Conservation Strategies
      • Migratory Species
      • SSG Statements
      • Identification Guide
      • Trade
      • Other
    • Scientific References
    • Conservation Strategies >
      • Conservation Strategies: Sawfish
      • Conservation Strategies: Devil and Manta Rays
      • Conservation Strategies: Angel Sharks
    • Policy Planning >
      • CITES >
        • CITES 17th CoP
      • The Convention on Migratory Species and Sharks
      • The Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Sharks (Sharks MOU)
      • The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and Sharks
      • RFMOs
      • IPOA-Sharks
    • Workshops >
      • IUCN SSC SSG Workshops
      • Red List News
    • Press
    • Links
    • Media Resources
  • News
  • Contact
  • Donate

News

Assessing Extinction Risk for Global Shark Trends

20/12/2020

 
​Peter M. Kyne | SSG Red List Authority Coordinator
Picture
© Olivier Born | Save Our Seas Foundation 2019
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is recognized as the most comprehensive, objective, global approach for evaluating the conservation status of species. Individual species as assessed against the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria to determine their relative risk of extinction (see Categories overview below), with the aim of highlighting those species which are facing an elevated risk of global extinction (those assessed in the threatened categories: Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable). There are currently 1,091 published chondrichthyan assessments on the IUCN Red List, largely the result of nearly 20 years of Red Listing effort by the SSG.
Picture
Because assessments have a lifespan of 10 years, the SSG has began the task of reassessing extinction risk for all ~1,250 known species (or assessing them for the first time for newly described species). Recent regional assessment approaches have assessed the fauna of the Northeast Pacific, the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean, Australia, the Arabian Sea and Adjacent Waters Region, and New Zealand and Oceania. The Global Shark Trends Project will be working its way around the globe through a series of regional and thematic assessment projects (see map below):

  • Regional assessment projects: Sub-Equatorial Africa (2018), Atlantic South America (2018), Eastern Central and Southeast Pacific (2019), Northwest and Western Central Atlantic (2019), Northwest Pacific (2019), West Africa (2019), and Southeast Asia (2020).

  • Thematic assessment projects: Ghost Sharks (2018), Wedgefishes and Giant Guitarfishes (2018; see article below), wide-ranging pelagic species (2018), wide-ranging coastal species (2020), and wide-ranging deepwater species (2020).
Picture
While some recent projects such as the Arabian Sea and Adjacent Waters Region, and New Zealand, undertook regional level assessments, the focus on the Global Shark Trends Project is exactly as it appears in the title: “Global”. That is, Red List assessments are undertaken at the global level, evaluating extinction risk across the entire distribution of a species’ range. Regional assessment projects will evaluate endemic species, while thematic assessment projects will evaluate wider-ranging species. As an example, although both the Daggernose Shark (Isogomphodon oxyrhynchus) and the Blue Shark (Prionace glauca) occur off Brazil, the former is being assessed under the Atlantic South America assessment project as it is endemic to that region, and the latter is being assessed under the wide-ranging pelagic assessment project as it occurs not only off Brazil, but circumglobally in the Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic Oceans.

Each assessment project consists of the following steps:
  1. Project team partners with Regional Vice-Chairs to engage with SSG members and other experts
  2. Data Collation (collation and synthesis of data/knowledge relevant to population trends of each species)
  3. Assessment Workshop
  4. Draft Assessment Preparation
  5. SSG Consultation (members are provided with table of draft assessments)
  6. Internal Assessment Review (each assessment is reviewed by 2 experts in the application of the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria)
  7. Assessment Finalisation (following the IUCN Documentation Standards and Consistency Checks guidelines)
  8. Submission of species assessments to the IUCN Red List Unit
  9. Assessment Review by the IUCN Red List Unit
  10. Publication of species assessments on the Red List of Threatened Species
Given that Red List Criterion A (the ‘population decline’ criterion) is the most relevant to assessing extinction risk in most chondrichthyans, reassessing species will largely focus on data to support understanding population trends and the overlap between threats and species’ distribution. Assessments will focus on directly evaluating a species against the Categories and Criteria, rather than providing an in-depth summary of a species’ distribution, life history, threats, and conservation measures. This information forms an essential part of a species assessment, but only where it is relevant to extinction risk.
 
The Global Shark Trends Project team will work with the relevant Regional Vice Chairs and members to prepare draft assessments with input from species and fisheries experts either during the workshops themselves, or outside of a workshop setting. As outlined in step 5 above, the project team will provide the SSG network with draft assessment categories for their consideration, as part of the consultation process.
 
The assessment approach aims to marry the Red List training and experience of the Global Shark Trends Project team with the species and fisheries knowledge of the member network. Member’s contributions will be credited in assessments as relevant, and additional opportunities for publications are arising from many of our Red Listing activities. The task ahead is not trivial, but we have already been humbled by the remarkable contribution of the membership and other experts thus far.  
 
If you have any queries regarding the project’s Red Listing activities, or wish to know more about how you can get involved, please contact me at peter.kyne@cdu.edu.au


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    January 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    December 2020
    June 2018
    December 2014

    Categories

    All
    Conservation
    Conservation Strategy Sawfish
    Conservation Strategy - Sawfish
    Fisheries
    Global Analysis
    Global Shark Trends Project 2018 2020
    IUCN Red List Updates
    Management
    Meeting
    Newsletter
    Publication
    Region Update
    Shark News
    Working Group


  • Home
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • Sponsors
    • Communication >
      • Visual Identity and Brand Guide
      • Communication Strategy
    • Documents
    • Membership | TOR
    • FAQ
  • Members
    • Who We Are >
      • Our Team
      • Our Members
      • Our History
    • Where We Work >
      • North America
      • Central America and the Caribbean
      • South America
      • Northern Europe
      • Mediterranean
      • Africa
      • Indian Ocean
      • ​Asia
      • Oceania
    • What We Do >
      • Aquarium Working Group
      • Assess Working Group
      • Bycatch Working Group
      • Communication Working Group
      • Deepwater Chondrichthyans Working Group
      • Future Leaders Working Group
      • Human Dimensions Working Group
      • Integrative Taxonomy Working Group
      • Marine Historical Ecology Working Group
  • Resources
    • Shark News >
      • Shark News | Submission Guidelines
    • Shark News Legacy
    • Publications >
      • Status Reports
      • Fisheries Management
      • Conservation Strategies
      • Migratory Species
      • SSG Statements
      • Identification Guide
      • Trade
      • Other
    • Scientific References
    • Conservation Strategies >
      • Conservation Strategies: Sawfish
      • Conservation Strategies: Devil and Manta Rays
      • Conservation Strategies: Angel Sharks
    • Policy Planning >
      • CITES >
        • CITES 17th CoP
      • The Convention on Migratory Species and Sharks
      • The Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Sharks (Sharks MOU)
      • The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and Sharks
      • RFMOs
      • IPOA-Sharks
    • Workshops >
      • IUCN SSC SSG Workshops
      • Red List News
    • Press
    • Links
    • Media Resources
  • News
  • Contact
  • Donate